Restriction On Noise # Essay For IELTS

Some people believe that individuals must be allowed to make as much noise as they want to, while others are of the opinion that the amount of noise that people make should be strictly restricted. Discuss both views and give your opinion with examples.


With the change in the way people did their jobs, there has been a considerable shift in how people live. With more and more people taking up tiring day jobs, they are left with only night and tend to party. This has caused a debate on whether there must be a regulation on noise or not. Some people believe that the city should regulate the level of noise in residential area while others say that this measure is too strict for some citizens.

With increasing stress in their work places, some people assert that they have their basic rights to generate noise freely in their places. They argue that after a long tiring day, they only get the night to relax and spend time with their family. If in this time, they do recreational activities like karaoke, or may be party, it only helps them relax. Secondly, everyone does not have the same way of living and trying to fit in a certain norm of lifestyle is too much of a burden.

On the other hand, it is certainly true that people also have the right to deserve peace and quiet when they stay in their houses. For instance, children who have their schools in the morning tend to get disturbed by the noise causing poor performance in the school. Even more, exposure to excessive levels of noise for a long time can cause detrimental effects such as sleep deprivation, depression or healing impairment.

Overall, in my opinion, every one surely has their own rights to generate noise, but we live in a society and therefore city must issue some regulations to limit noise pollution.

IELTSBAND7

Problems Of Working Parents # Essay

Nowadays, many families have both parents working. Some working parents believe that other family members, like grandparents can take care of the children, while others are of the opinion that child care centres provide the best care. Discuss both views and give your opinion.


The world has changed dramatically with a complete scenario change in how the people used to live and work. In today’s era, most of the families have both working parents, leaving them little or no time to raise their offspring’s. As a result, some of them have turned to other family members and believe that grandparents can take care of their child in a great way, while others are of the opinion that it is better idea to bring kids to child care organisation.
A child brought up in care of his or her grandparents always grows up with assets that prove to helpful in longer run. Firstly, grandparents have already their own kids and have live experience of raising children, and hence will have a better idea about child care skills and will be able to look after little kids. Secondly, it creates a sense of a happy family and family oriented youths tend to grow up to have better relationships with their elders and other people in general.
Turning to the other side of argument, child care organisations have employees that are trained in babysitting skills and know how to cope with kids in various situations such as unsafe circumstances or accidents. For instance, if a child falls down and injures himself/herself they know what to do as they have learned first aid skills.
Overall, in my opinion, although child care organisation know their job, the love and compassion that a child can get from his/her grand parents can nowhere be found.

IELTSBAND7

Problem Of Traffic Congestion # Essay

The best way to solve the problem of traffic congestion is for governments to provide free transport 24/7.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?


With growing population, traffic congestion has become a concerning issue for most of the governments worldwide. Not only it has caused increased levels of stress, but also contributes to increasing pollution rates. Some people assert that in order to tackle this issue, the best measure is providing free public transportation to citizens. In my opinion, it would not be the most logical thing to do.

There are several factors that stand in way of providing free public transportation. Firstly, in terms of cost, subsidizing all expenses of public transport requires abundant of budget which might not be very practical. Instead of generating money on public transportation, the government should pay attention to other important sectors such as education or public health.

Secondly, the prices of buses and taxis are very nominal, reducing them to free, would increase the chances of corruption. For instance, a person can register himself or herself as conductor and let us say earn 20k per month. But this person employs some other at 10 k on the same job.

Looking at the other side of the coin, free public services could act as a boon for the students or poor who don’t have enough money to travel long distances, and are often forced to either take lifts or go by walking. Even more, it will reduce the crime rates as lesser number of people will take lifts from unknown people.

Overall, offering free public transportation for citizens is not feasible because of the high cost of maintenance and chances of increased corruption. In my opinion, there are other alternative methods such as increased awareness, or high taxes on personal vehicles which could prove as better options.

IELTSBAND7

Better Employee – Young Or Old ? # Essay

Some people are of the opinion that young and energetic employees are the most valuable for the company while other argue that older employees have more experience and knowledge.
Discuss.


With the young people getting into jobs, a universal discussion on whether young employees play critical role in an organisation over the older or experienced workers, has come into fore front. Although some favour the energy and the novelty that a youngster brings along with him/her, many are of the opinion that the experience is what helps in taking better decisions.

There are certain factors that do favour the young. Firstly, with technological advancement in the every field, youngsters have become the preferred choice. This is because young people have just graduated and are more familiar with the latest technology and keep themselves updated.
Secondly, younger workers are more flexible and adjustable when it comes to change departments or positions. This is mainly because the young is only responsible for himself/herself, unlike the older generation which has lot of responsibilities.

Turning to the other side of argument, older generation come with their experience, which is very important in the jobs requiring responsibility. They are more aware of the tricks and traps of the games and can mostly make better decisions. Even more, older employees have worked in technologies which are now obsolete, which can help them to create new things.

Overall, in my opinion, the true value of a company is a vibrant, energetic and ready to learn, relearn and unlearn, employee. It could either be a young candidate or an older gen person.
IELTSBAND7

1 2