Genome Project # Practice Reading

You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based on Reading Passage 1 below.

[A]Soon after the Californian twins were born, their parents grew concerned: the children were developing slowly and had floppy muscle tone. A brain scan indicated that the boy might have cerebral palsy, but doctors were puzzled over his sister’s tremor and seizures. Batteries of tests failed to confirm diagnoses in either child, or treatment when the children were five with the drug-dopa — used for people with Parkinson’s disease — helped only for a while.

[B]It was only in 2010, when the twins reached the age of 14, that whole-genome sequencing ended their diagnostic odyssey. It identified a pair of mutations in a gene that encodes the enzyme sepiapterin reductase, which is involved in production of the neurotransmitters dopamine and serotonin. Doctors modified the treatment to include serotonin; the boy’s mobility improved, and the girl was no longer plagued by sudden, breath-stealing spasms.

[C]Stories such as this one fuel ambitions to diagnose more quickly and accurately using genomic medicine. Indeed, tests that can probe certain disease-associated genes are increasingly becoming a diagnostic option. But such genetic tests often fail to give a diagnosis because they are too focused on a selection of known genes on one section of the genome. In cases like that of the twins, researchers or clinicians must go further and sample a person’s whole genetic sequence to find the disease-causing genes. Currently this is done only in rare cases — but a number of large-scale initiatives are poised to bring whole-genome analysis into routine medical care.

[D]The United Kingdom has taken a giant leap into genomic medicine with the 100,000 Genomes Project, which was launched in 2012 and has been personally backed by Prime Minister David Cameron. As part of the £300-million (US$467-million) initiative, 100,000 genomes from National Health Service (NHS) patients with cancer, rare disorders and infectious diseases will be sequenced by 2017. The project’s aims are to gain scientific insight by linking the disorders with precise genetic signatures; to obtain better diagnoses; to tailor treatments to individual patients; and, ultimately, to spur the development of a UK genomics industry.

“The goal is to make whole genomes part of regular NHS health records.”

[E]The state-funded, centralized UK health-care system is ideal for such population-based approaches in genomic medicine, says John Bell, who is a medical researcher at the University of Oxford, UK, and is also on the board of Genomics England, the NHS-owned company set up to run the project. The NHS already holds extensive clinical information on individuals, and pairing this with detailed genomic data will enable powerful insights into the links between medicine and genetics. Evidence that whole-genome interpretation can help in a wide range of disorders is mounting, and in the long term, Bell says, the goal is to make whole genomes part of regular NHS health records.

[F]But before that vision can be realized, there are several hurdles that the 100,000 Genomes Project must overcome. Aside from the logistical task of extracting and sequencing DNA from thousands of individuals, there is the problem of identifying which genome variations cause disease and which are harmless — a daunting, data-heavy and time-consuming process that will require a slew of specialized companies with dedicated software.

Considerable cohort

[G]Iceland was the first to launch a large-scale genomic analysis of its population. Many nations have followed suit with the explicit goal of linking health care and genomics. In the United States, the Precision Medicine Initiative plans to sequence the genomes of one million volunteers, and the Million Veteran Program is gearing up to do likewise with US military veterans. Similar projects are under way in Canada, Australia, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Kuwait, Qatar, Israel, Belgium, Luxembourg and Estonia.

[H]But the 100,000 Genomes Project is the venture gaining the most steam: it has already enrolled 3,500 people with rare diseases and 2,000 individuals with cancer, and will involve roughly 75,000 people altogether (see ‘The clinical genome’). People with rare diseases and their relatives will make up 50,000 of the final figure; 80% of rare diseases are inherited, so the genome of the affected person (usually a child) will be sequenced along with the genomes of two of their closest blood relatives. The remaining group of 25,000 will be composed of people with cancer, who will have their genome sequenced twice (the tumour DNA will be compared with that from a patient’s normal cells), giving the grand total of 100,000 genome sequences.

[I]The hope is that participants will benefit from clinical insights into their condition. But their genomes will also contribute knowledge of value to the entire patient community. One person’s prostate-cancer genome, for example, might reveal specific genetic patterns that a physician can compare against the Genomics England database. The physician can then find other people with similar patterns and learn which drugs and procedures worked best for them.

Questions 1-5

Choose the correct letter A, B, or C.

  1. What was the concern of the parents of the two kids?

A. The children had floppy disc.

B.The children were suffering from cerebral palsy.

C.The children had Parkinson’s disease.

2.What changes were observed in the girl at the age of 14?

A. She was showing hormone changes.

B.The girl was not having any breath-stealing spasms.

C. Her mobility was improved.

3.The reason behind the failure of genetic tests is?

A. The technology has still not improved much.

B. They focus 100,000 Genomes Project on a selection of known genes.

C. The persons who genetic structure is not being checked.

4.The country which launched the 100,000 Genomes Project is

A. United Kingdom

B.Australia

C.United States of America.

5.The main aim of the genome’s project is

A. to obtain better diagnoses

B. to spur the development of a UK genomics industry.

C. Both A and B

Questions 6-9

Do the following statements agree with the information given in the reading passage 3?

In boxes 6-9 on your answer sheet, write

TRUE             if the statement agrees with the information.

FALSE           if the statement contradicts with the information.

NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this

 

  1. Genomics England is a NHS owned company.
  2. With the data available with NHS, the genomes are part of regular NHS health records.
  3. The issue with 1000 genome project is identifying which genome variations cause disease and which are harmless.
  4. United Kingdom was the first country to launch a large-scale genomic analysis of its population.
  5. Precision Medicine Initiative is being carried out in United States.

 

Questions 11-13

Complete the summary below.

Write the answers in NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS in your answer sheet.

Genome project has already enrolled 3,500 people with rare diseases and 2,000 individuals with cancer, and will involve roughly 75,000 people altogether. Since the rare diseases are often inherited, genome of the affected person (usually a child) will be sequenced along with the genomes of two of their (11) _________________.  People suffering from cancer will have their genome sequenced (12) ___________. The hope is that participants will benefit from clinical insights into their condition. But their genomes will also contribute knowledge of value to the entire patient community. One person’s prostate-cancer genome might reveal a lot about the genetic patterns. This will in turn help in learning which (13) _____________ will work best for the person suffering from cancer.

IELTSBAND7

Living On Own # Essay For IELTS

 This is an IELTS academic essay.

You should spend 40 minutes on this task.

In many countries around the world young people decide to leave their parents’ home once they finish school. They start living on their own or share a home with friends.

Do you agree or disagree with this approach? Give your opinion.

 

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

SAMPLE ANSWER


 

We all are individuals and need to take our responsibility after a certain age. However, in few countries it has been observed that, often the young minds on completion of their schools, tend to move out of their parental house. They either share their living with friends or decide to completely live on their own means. Many people hold the opinion, that this early shifting helps kids to become more responsible from an early age. Those who disagree point out that, often kids stumble and after falling, never get up in their lives.

There is nothing better than a responsible young mind. Moving out and living on own means, most importantly, brings out in an individual the ability of taking responsibility for their own decisions. Once they realize that there is no backing up, often it has been seen that people start making wiser decisions. For instance, a person living without his/her parents, knows that if some mishap happens, they are the first one to help themselves. As a result, they tend to be more careful. Secondly, they are forced to face challenges that will help them to understand and grow in life better. Thirdly, a child realizes the importance of parents. For instance, when my sister moved out of her house and started living in a new city all alone, she understood how much pain parents go through to provide a healthy environment to their child. This realization made her respect and love her parents more.

Those who disagree point out that a child is more susceptible to the outside world. Sending them out of house even before they are mature enough, often leaves their lives shattered. Firstly, it is during growing years that a child needs the support of parents the most. They are already facing issues in life, mostly because of various changes in their body. Sending them out and allowing them to live alone could add insult to their misery. Secondly, it is not always that a young person knows his/her best. It is even possible that they fall into wrong hands and destroy their lives.

Overall, it can be said that living on own means surely inculcates strong ethics such as taking responsibility, it must be made sure that a child when living alone is still near parents. This helps in giving them both the advantages and helping them during their growing years.

IELTSBAND7

 

 

Topics For Speaking Part I

The first part of the speaking section, consist of general questions and lasts for 4-5 minutes. The questions asked are the ones that are usually related to the person, and are there, to  merely check, how well the person can express himself or herself in day to day situations. So, let us have a look at some of the topics asked in the first section of IELTS Speaking.

WORK

  • Where do you work?
  • Why did you choose that job?
  • Is it popular  in your country?
  • Do you like your job?
  • How well do you get along with your colleagues?
  • What was the first day at job like?
  • What responsibilities do you have at your job?
  • If given the chance, will you change your job? Why?

STUDY

  • What do you study?
  • Why did you choose that subject?
  • Is it a popular subject in your school?
  • Do you like that subject?
  • What kind of bond do you share with your subject mates?
  • How was the first day at your school like?
  • What are the main aspects of your subject?
  • Do you plan to getting a job in the same subject or you want to change your subject?

HOMETOWN

  • Where is your hometown?
  • Do you like your hometown?
  • How often do you visit your hometown?
  • What is your hometown like?
  • What are the places to visit in your hometown?
  • How can your home town be improved?
  • Has your home town changed with time?
  • How are the transportation facilities in your hometown?
  • Do you think your hometown is a good place for growing children?

HOME

  • Where is your home and of what kind?
  • Whom do you live with?
  • How many rooms are their in your home?
  • Do you have a single room or you share your room with someone?
  • How are the walls of your home decorated?
  • Is there anything you would like to change about your home?
  • Do you plan to live there in future?
  • What facilities are available near your home?
  • Do you plan to live there in the future?
  • What is your neighborhood like?
  • Do most people live in houses in your country?

IELTSBAND7

Home Schooling # Essay For IELTS

The question is of IELTS general.
Home schooling belongs to the past and is unacceptable in the modern society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Use your knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.


SAMPLE ANSWER

Everything has two sides and home schooling is not an exception. In the past, it seemed like the most natural way of teaching, but in present times it has come under scrutiny.

The people favouring home schooling have come with various arguments. Firstly, a child learns from someone he/she is the most close to i.e. parents. When the kid learns from his/her parents, the bond between them increases. In addition, it helps him/her to learn things beyond a fixed curriculum. For instance, Angelina Jolie, home schools her kids. When asked her about it, she said, she has a job where she has to travel a lot. Home schooling her kids, help them to learn things that are more practical. They get to meet new people, see new cultures and understand how life operates. Secondly, when a child learns at home, he/she is saved from the unnecessary pressure that often school environment builds in. Even more, often kids get bullied or punished, a home provides them the best environment to study. Thirdly, it caters to the development of an individual aptitude and abilities. For example, a kid interested in music, need not to learn anything except music.

Nevertheless, there are even facts against home tutoring. The first major drawback is that it is not for everyone. In the past, at least one parent used to dedicate their time at home. However, in present times with both parents involved in making their own career, home schooling could stop the kid from learning at all. Secondly, often parents themselves are not very well educated. This might be possible because of the circumstances they have faced, however, they want their kids to follow their dreams. It is in these cases that the arguments favouring public school system, get their advantage. Thirdly, to an extent, restricting a child to house, reduces the exposure he/she might get, if he/she goes on and faces life on its own.

Overall, I believe that the decision must lie on the parents and even more so on kids. Both of the ways of teaching have their own benefits, but in the end it all boils down to this that every individual is unique and has his/her own unique circumstances and the teaching must be the one that helps the child in his/her individual growth.

IELTSBAND7

1 450 451 452 453 454 541