Category: Agree / Disagree

You should spend 40 minutes on this task.
The improved technology allows for rapid and uncontrolled access to and exchange of information. Far from being beneficial, this is dangerous for the society.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

---

Digitalisation and the coming of internet has surely changed the way world operated. Some people are of the opinion that the free access to information is quite dangerous for the individual, however others are of the opinion that we have benefited more from technology advancement.
With the availability of every data on click, surely has posed some serious threats. Firstly, the data is no longer secure. For instance, most of the companies now store their data in a particular server or a database. Although some people regard it as safe, if this data gets hacked, the company can get broke.
Secondly, it has opened a new way of crime. Most people are now very comfortable putting their personal lives on internet, especially social sites. If the wrong person gets access to the site, he/she can ruin the person’s life as has often been seen.
Looking towards the positive aspect, technology advancement has surely made our lives easier. Firstly, with coming of internet banking and other services on internet, people can easily do their work without getting into the hassle of waiting in long lines. Secondly, learning was never this much fun. With every piece of information on internet, people who are not financially strong can even study at the best universities and make their career. Example, Harvard University offers several courses online for free, helping millions of people worldwide.
Overall, in my opinion, every coin does has both sides and technology surely has some negatives. But the advantages offered by it, outlook the issues caused.

IELTSBAND7

You should spend 40 minutes on this task.

With an increasing population communicating via internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become thing of past.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Write at least 250 words.

---

Internet has revolutionized our lives and changed the way people communicate with each other. Gone are the days of letters and meetings, people instantly send messages of facebook or whatsapp. Some people fear that with coming of internet, people will stop interacting personally and the entire communication will shift from personal to online. In my opinion, although the shift is considerable, it can never replace the face to face interaction.

Internet has helped millions of people in communicating with people they want to. People living at far distance from their family  members are easily able to communicate with their family  and friends at just one click. Even more, the shy people have got a space for interaction. For instance, people who would otherwise not interact with people now go about talking in great lengths with people all across the world.

However, now a days, people often get hooked up to phone, talking to people they will never meet, rather than enjoying with the ones who are near to them. This has in some sense, although bridged a gap between people living far away but also created a gap between those living near.

To sum up, people have surely  changed the way they interact and communication has become online but one cannot deny that people still prefer face to face interaction for important meetings and it is less likely that personal interaction will lose its importance in near future.

IELTSBAND7

 

The best way to solve the problem of traffic congestion is for governments to provide free transport 24/7.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

---

With growing population, traffic congestion has become a concerning issue for most of the governments worldwide. Not only it has caused increased levels of stress, but also contributes to increasing pollution rates. Some people assert that in order to tackle this issue, the best measure is providing free public transportation to citizens. In my opinion, it would not be the most logical thing to do.

There are several factors that stand in way of providing free public transportation. Firstly, in terms of cost, subsidizing all expenses of public transport requires abundant of budget which might not be very practical. Instead of generating money on public transportation, the government should pay attention to other important sectors such as education or public health.

Secondly, the prices of buses and taxis are very nominal, reducing them to free, would increase the chances of corruption. For instance, a person can register himself or herself as conductor and let us say earn 20k per month. But this person employs some other at 10 k on the same job.

Looking at the other side of the coin, free public services could act as a boon for the students or poor who don’t have enough money to travel long distances, and are often forced to either take lifts or go by walking. Even more, it will reduce the crime rates as lesser number of people will take lifts from unknown people.

Overall, offering free public transportation for citizens is not feasible because of the high cost of maintenance and chances of increased corruption. In my opinion, there are other alternative methods such as increased awareness, or high taxes on personal vehicles which could prove as better options.

IELTSBAND7

Some educationalist believe that non-exam, art based subjects, such as music, drama and art should be compulsory in secondary school curriculum. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

---

A school is for the all-round development of a child, which includes, both personality as well as intellectual development. Most people are of the opinion that having non-exam based subjects such as music, drama and art give a boost to the varied inherent skills that students have.

The subjects other than math and science would provide students with more choice. They learn skills in a way that is not just job oriented. Even more, a personality of a person is defined by the extra-curricular activities, and art based subjects provide the exposure an early impressions required for increasing creativity. This is the sought after trait in any profession and would greatly enhance the prospects of any youngster.

We are in an era, when the world needs more of inventors, artist, painters an performers as much as we need doctors and engineers. Although in a rush of getting a job at the biggest MNC, causes these subjects to be pushed to the periphery and not thought of as important. It has been observed that students who do not study in schools which have art based subjects tend to develop a narrow view of the world.

Overall, there is an opinion that studying art would not lead to a meaningful career and could quite possibly land the art graduate into unemployment. I believe, art based subjects provide essential skills that can be useful for architects, designers, scientist or any other professional to use sound, visuals and creative representation of their ideas.
IELTSBAND7